Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: The GPL (and Linux?) in court

  • Subject: Re: The GPL (and Linux?) in court
  • From: Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:41:51 +0200
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:Zn4eVDcD284DwevSUKSW9Vrs7Xg=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: CERN LHC - http://public.web.cern.ch/public/
  • References: <4nkgdnFasdlkU1@individual.net> <20060923114806.28d93c3c@localhost.localdomain> <87irje77i6.fsf@geemail.com> <20060923200215.78794327@localhost.localdomain> <a5mgu3-vmo.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <reply_in_group-2E9D28.18433923092006@news.supernews.com> <20060924133438.10e1ac90@localhost.localdomain>
  • User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1159408
ed <ed@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:43:39 -0700
> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> In article <a5mgu3-vmo.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>  Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > least, until they've been caught each time.  Free software needs no
>> > theft, stealing software is wrong.  Use Linux, observe the GPL.
>> 
>> How come stealing software is wrong, but stealing artwork is OK with
>> you?
>
> What artwork?

Roy plagiarised someones images and passed them off as his own. It is
well documented and Roy ended up apologising.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index