Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Sunday 24 September 2006 08:10 \__
>
>> begin oe_protect.scr
>> Buford Ressup <buford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:26:00 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>>>
>>>> On a slightly different note, paging back up the thread, I noticed this
>>>> Erik using the standard english construction "if it were", rather than
>>>> the
>>>> usual American "if it was"; I don't read Erik's posts usually, so
>>>> haven't seen his style for a while, but I do recall him confusing
>>>> dependent with dependant, so it seems surprising to see such a
>>>> construction, and gives the strong impression that someone else wrote
>>>> some, if not all, of that posting?
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts anyone?
>>>
>>> He's confusing it's with its, as well. I remember Erik being a bit more
>>> literate than he's seemed, lately. Maybe he's getting senile. :)
>>
>> Ahh, perhaps :-)
>
> There's less need to proofread when so many killfiles have the messages
> eliminated.
>
> Roy
Coming from the poster with the most errors ever, that is really
funny. Hint : try reading the articles you plagiarise before you comment
on them. You wont come across as such a mindless obsessive then.
--
I've run DOOM more in the last few days than I have the last few
months. I just love debugging ;-)
(Linus Torvalds)
|
|
