On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:20:18 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>__/ [ z ] on Saturday 23 September 2006 17:52 \__
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> __/ [ Paul ] on Saturday 23 September 2006 12:13 \__
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:08:37 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Could sniff user-agent and deliver different content
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't that come under black hat ?
>>>
>>> Maybe for the Web site (well, it's the Webmaster that risks banishment),
>>
>> Unless you are buddies with Google, like Webmasterworld. I still can't
>> believe that Google lets them cloak their pages like that. Try visiting as
>> Googlebot and watch the login screen disappear and the link structure
>> change.
>
>I guess that the NYT (among others) should not get any Google luv either.
>Compromises, compromises.
>
>For some reason, I seem to recall a rumour/article which said googleguy is
>Matt Cutts.
I made reference to that on here not so long ago. Sniff... knew you
didn't read my posts... sniff...
BB
--
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/angels-beside-me/michael-guardian.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/anri/black-king.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/art-impressions/sax-appeal.html
|
|
