On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:25:38 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Open source SplendidCRM a sweet alternative for ".Net-centric" SAAS provider
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| Now that he's gained some practical experience with an open source
>| application, Schepis says he'd use it again. "So long as there's
>| existing knowledge, or an easy way to get up to speed, there's no
>| difference between using open source and commercial. Actually, there's
>| an additional benefit, because you have access to the source and
>| the licensing fees are much lower. Just make sure you set your
>| expectations in line with the experience level of the people who
>| are going to implement it for you."
> `----
>
> http://www.itmanagersjournal.com/feature/22363
You are such a fucking liar, Roy. Jesus.
The entire article is about how the PHP based SugarCRM wouldn't work for
them, so instead they went with a SplendidCRM which *IS* a .NET based
product. But instead, you choose to lie with your title and claim that
they "Dumped" their .NET based software. Nothing is further from the
truth.
I challenge *ANYONE* to read the article and explain how Roy could
"accidentally" come to the conclusion he did in the title. Anyone?
Bueller?
|
|