John Locke <johnlocke98513@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>Oh that's right. It doesn't. Because you Roy Schestowitz are a
>>dishonest liar.
>
> I haven't found this to be the case. Quite the contrary. In any
> event, people can read the artcles for themselves to determine
> the content.
>
What on earth do the articles in question have in connection with Roy's
lies? Please. Use some sense when defending a spammer like Roy.
--
They are most deceived that trusteth most in themselves.
|
|