__/ [ NoStop ] on Thursday 26 April 2007 04:20 \__
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> __/ [ John Bailo ] on Wednesday 25 April 2007 16:58 \__
>>
>>> thad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> These include:
>>>>
>>>> - Reduced RAM requirements and improved speed and stability.
>>>>
>>>> - Support for a much wider range of hardware, including
>>>>
>>>> - A new security architecture that makes Windows invulnerable
>>>>
>>>> - Additional user interface enhancements, including the
>>>>
>>>> - Huge improvements to the Windows Update system, extending
>>>
>>> This is hilarious.
>>>
>>> These are not "fixes" -- these are primary design considerations that
>>> would have been part of any project plan when they launched Vista's
>>> development more than 7 years ago!
>>>
>>> This is like the kid who had a week to prepare his school paper, and
>>> then wrote it up the night before.
>>>
>>> Now he wants to "fix" it.
>>>
>>> Too late...the ship has left the port.
>>>
>>> Linux wins.
>>
>> Microsoft also said that Vista would be the most secure OS ever. They said
>> they had 6000 (?) drivers and that Vista would be the ultimate gaming OS
>> (almost nothing would run). I think this whole thing is just PR and should
>> be treated as such.
>>
> Actually it was tongue in cheek. Loosen up their Roy. :-)
>
> Cheers.
I read John's reply (and replied) before reading the OP. Then I read the
other messages and realised what was happening. My bad.
--
~~ With kind regards
Roy S. Schestowitz | "I blame God for making me an atheist"
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
5:00am up 11 days 4:28, 5 users, load average: 1.44, 1.68, 1.52
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
|
|
