Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> ____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 07 August 2007 17:48 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> ____/ 7 on Monday 06 August 2007 22:16 : \____
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Fake Steve Jobs" is Daniel Lyons, in case anyone wants to sue
>>>>>
>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>> | Maybe we should be, since this is the man who wrote about the "evils" of
>>>>> | anonymous blogging in "Attack of the Blogs", where he said that blogs
>>>>> | are ?the prized platform of an online lynch mob spouting liberty but
>>>>> | spewing lies, libel and invective.?
>>>>> |
>>>>> | Um. Dude. Talk about world class hypocrisy.
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070805195515884
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAA!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> There are *NO* real Micoshaft Corporation supporters out there.
>>>> All the dum dums that come out in support for Micoshaft are fully
>>>> paid up bum boys willing able and and ready to be rent boys
>>>> for Micoshaft Corporation.
>>>>
>>>> And when they get discovered, the big roar of laughter goes out again.
>>>>
>>>> How many more I wonder.
>>>
>>> I wonder if somebody will sue. If you know Daniel Lyons and his history
>>> (never mind his anti-Linus posts in this blog), then there's a strong case.
>>> The guy is an Editor at Forbes, mind you (not very active recently), and the
>>> agenda of that publication shows. Lyons, much like Forbes, is nothing but a
>>> Microsoft shill (and probably a shill for other corporate agandae).
>>>
>>
>> I think it does illustrate something which has become very clear here
>> over the last year or so during which we've been having News postings
>> and Digests, that Forbes are very very much pro-Microsoft.
>>
>> The News and Digests have thrown up all kinds of interesting trends,
>> once the information is gathered together and shown in the right way.
>> Clearly, a lot of corporate interests have been relying on hiding these
>> kinds of things, or relying on the news 'dieing down', but it doesn't
>> need to, if interested people are willing to keep the flag flying.
>
> And to think that Forbes still premits this man to cover Linux stories.
>
> Do you know what headline he used on November 2nd (Microsoft/Novell deal)?
>
> "Microsoft Linux"
>
To be fair, this is probably something many of us would agree with,
though, isn't it? We all know that Microsoft must lose the battle
against open-source; the economics make it inevitable. They are left
with simple choices, do they join in, or leave the game entirely?
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |
|
|
