____/ Mark Kent on Saturday 04 August 2007 10:36 : \____
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> ____/ Mark Kent on Friday 03 August 2007 14:15 : \____
>>
>>> Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft blames baby's parents for deadly Xbox fire
>>>>>
>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>> | Specifically, Redmond claims that the suit, which also names Wal-mart
>>>>> | and and an anonymous power-supply maker, lacks merit because the Klines
>>>>> | "knowingly, willingly, intentionally, and voluntarily exposed
>>>>> | themselves to said danger and assumed the risk of incident, injuries,
>>>>> | losses, and damages"
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9012499
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Damn... if Microsoft had NOT rushed a half-baked, half-tested product to
>>>> market, it wouldn't be having these problems... It's just so sad that
>>>> someone has died because of a filthy bunch of idiots like them...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Microsoft appear to be trying to claim that because they issued a recall
>>> on some faulty aspect of the Xbox, they have no liability for the
>>> problem. An interesting approach, but I doubt a jury would necessarily
>>> see it that way, an interesting question might be that if the problem
>>> were so serious, why didn't Microsoft do more to get the appropriate,
>>> dangerous, parts replaced?
>>>
>>> It would seem that the Xbox did start the fire and as a consequence, the
>>> baby died.
>>>
>>> The battle would seem to be about whether Microsoft can avoid liability
>>> for the fire, which, it would seem, was started by the Xbox.
>>
>> Some people are very angry.
>>
>> http://www.599usdollars.com/599usd-talks-4-the-xbox-baby-killing-scandal/
>>
>
> Oh, they should be very very angry, quite rightly so. Microsoft do not
> care about customers, they just want the money. Their lawyers will be
> out in numbers to make sure that they do not get the blame for the fire
> started by their equipment, and they can be pretty sure that they will
> win, since deepness of pockets is 99% of the law, particularly in the
> US.
Having just read the latest developments (not from the most trusted source,
I'll admit), it appears as though Microsoft will ask the Kleins to even pay
legal fees. So not only has Microsoft negligence probably killed a baby, but
they also want legal compensation now.
Talking about pooping in your next-door neighbour's garden and then asking
him/her for some toilet paper...
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Windows O/S: chmod a-x internet; kill -9 internet
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 126 total, 1 running, 125 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
|
|
