BearItAll <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hadron wrote:
>
>> BearItAll <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> SCO's Letter to Customers and Partners
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>> | So there you have it. How does that sound to you? Like the lawyers
>>>> | haven't finished their analysis of the ruling, but that the management
>>>> | would like to soldier onward in whatever ways are possible? That's how
>>>> | it sounds to me too. The last sentence says "the legal team will focus
>>>> | on the necessary actions needed to protect SCO, its customers and
>>>> | shareholders". SCO is disappointed in the ruling, doesn't agree with
>>>> | it, is trying to stay afloat while it figures out what to do next, but
>>>> | it will do something.
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2007081421281115
>>>>
>>>
>>> Now that is strange coincidence, because it so happens that many a
>>> mugger, burgler and other people in prison at the moment also disagree
>>> with court rulings.
>>
>> How stupid can COLA be?
>>
>> No one "agrees" with a settlement ruling against them. If they agreed
>> then they would never have been in the settlement case in the first
>> place.
>
> ... and how stupid is hadron who thinks irony is something with iron in it.
>
That wasn't irony I am afraid, so another black mark.
|
|
