On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:47:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> PHP Vs ASP.net
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| Ever since Microsoft has come up with ASP.net, there has been a widespread
>| debate among programmers as to whether it is any better than the existing
>| open source programming language of PHP.
> `----
>
> http://www.bizfive.com/articles/web-design/comparing-php-and-asp.net/
>
> The strengths of PHP stand out.
This is an inherantly dishonest argument. ASP.NET is not language. PHP
is. ASP.NET is a class library, that can be used by many languages. I'm
givin the guy the benefit of the doubt that english isn't his first
language, but this comment is ridiculous:
"ASP.net is compiled into memory in binary code. So, when ASP.net is used
for coding, it is evident that it takes much longer time to process since
the codes need to be retrieved from memory."
So in his fantasy world, runtime interpretation is faster than binary,
pre-compiled native code. Yeah. uh huh.
|
|
