On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:12:17 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> ____/ Kier on Monday 27 August 2007 10:46 : \____
>
>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:39:28 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> ____/ Jerry McBride on Sunday 26 August 2007 20:55 : \____
>>>
>>>> waterskidoo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've pondered over this post for a couple of days and have finally decided
>>>>> to send it.
>>>>
>>>> ---snip---
>>>>
>>>>> I will leave you with one last talking point.
>>>>
>>>> No you won't... PLONK
>>>>
>>>> And don't let the door hit you in the ass...
>>>
>>> It's flatfish. Look at the style. Some people here had the suspicion before.
>>
>> Yes, I had the same suspicions, from time to time. But guess what? I
>> decided to stop being paranoid.
>>
>> Waterskidoo *defended you against criticism*, Roy. And what did you do in
>> return? You acted like a dickhead. That's shameful.
>
> There is no Waterskidoo. It's Gary. So now you're sort of attacking me and
> defending flatfish, but it's just because you haven't read enough posts to
> know what I know for a fact.
No, I'm not defending flatfish, and no, you don't know it for a fact. The
most you've got is a strong suspicion.
Ever though that seeing flatfish under every stone, like Reds under every
bed, merely plays right into his hands?
--
Kier
|
|
