____/ cc on Tuesday 28 August 2007 03:02 : \____
> On Aug 27, 8:40 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> ____/ William Poaster on Monday 27 August 2007 23:52 : \____
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > It was on, or about, Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:20:44 +0100, that as I was
>> > halfway through a large jam doughnut, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>> >> ____/ Kier on Monday 27 August 2007 11:00 : \____
>>
>> >>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:27:14 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>> >>>> ____/ Linonut on Monday 27 August 2007 03:09 : \____
>>
>> >>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o'
>> >>>>> wisdom:
>>
>> >>>>>> waterskidoo was all along flatfish
>>
>> >>>>>> -Replying to self with crossposting
>> >>>>>> -Knowledge or prior posts (going months back) -Familiarity with
>> >>>>>> people who no longer post here -Writing style (paragraphs and
>> >>>>>> newlines) -Child using XBox360
>> >>>>>> -Female identity
>> >>>>>> -Disappearing for several days after persistent posting, which
>> >>>>>> incidentally is the same time when vile behaviour from flashfish
>> >>>>>> nyms returns
>>
>> >>>>>> Flatfish had many people fooled, but it was several days ago that
>> >>>>>> some of us realised that waterskidoo is probably flatfish.
>>
>> >>>>>> That last post confirms it. No more evidence could probably be
>> >>>>>> needed. No need to even join more dots.
>>
>> >>>>> Roy, it is only suspicion, not confirmation. You probably should
>> >>>>> drop it.
>>
>> >>>>> Unless you like this flatfish guy coming at you with trash talk.
>>
>> >>>> No, I read many messages, so I know this for a /fact/. If I aligned
>> >>>> some messages and brought them together, you would see this too.
>>
>> >>> No, you don't. At best it's a strong suposition.
>>
>> >>>> Gary should quit using the waterskidoo nym because he spilled the
>> >>>> beans in many messages where it was flatfish ramblings coming from the
>> >>>> mouth of 'waterskidoo'.
>>
>> >>> Wrong again.
>>
>> >>>> It's just surprising that some people still don't see this, so I
>> >>>> assume that they haven't read enough messages and haven't seen all
>> >>>> those "Aha" 'smoking guns'. I've killfiled all the nyms, including
>> >>>> 'waterskidoo'. It saves bandwidth and reduces visual clutter.
>>
>> >>> I read everything she wrote. She stood up for you, Roy, are you going
>> >>> to conveniently ignore that? Stop being narrow-minded.
>>
>> >> There's no "she". It was Gary all along.
>>
>> > Boy, can some people be suckered in.
>>
>> And *I* am the one going under scrutiny. About 4 days ago Mark warned that
>> this puppet was putting wedges between the advocates. Even now that we know
>> it's Gary, there's tension between advocates, because of 'her' (Gary's index
>> finger puppet).
>>
>
> "Tension between advocates", or "a difference of opinion that occurs
> commonly in Usenet"?
Attacking one person while sucking up to another is a method for turning one
person against another. It's a classic technique. Good cop, bad cop.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Mod me up and I'll mod you 'insightful'"
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
05:05:01 up 21 days, 7:58, 6 users, load average: 1.11, 1.19, 1.49
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project
|
|
