On Aug 26, 10:09 pm, Linonut <lino...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>
>
> > waterskidoo was all along flatfish
>
> > -Replying to self with crossposting
> > -Knowledge or prior posts (going months back)
> > -Familiarity with people who no longer post here
> > -Writing style (paragraphs and newlines)
> > -Child using XBox360
> > -Female identity
> > -Disappearing for several days after persistent posting, which incidentally is
> > the same time when vile behaviour from flashfish nyms returns
>
> > Flatfish had many people fooled, but it was several days ago that some of us
> > realised that waterskidoo is probably flatfish.
>
> > That last post confirms it. No more evidence could probably be needed. No need
> > to even join more dots.
>
> Roy, it is only suspicion, not confirmation. You probably should drop
> it.
>
> Unless you like this flatfish guy coming at you with trash talk.
>
> --
> Tux rox!
I'm not coming at him with anything. He is the one threatening to sue,
not me.
I'm asking him to prove his accusations against me, or get lost.
I could care less what he claims about others although they should act
in the same fashion as I do.
In act I could care less what he says about me either, but he should
be called to task to prove his claims against me which he seems to be
ignoring.
So how about it Roy, prove I am Gary Stewart or shut up.
Simple enough right?
|
|
