Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <1575915.p2Dk81s5Em@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Is there some reason [H]omer is to be immune from criticism? Waterskiddoo
>> > attacked excessive zealotry in the advocacy of Linux, which in her
>> > opinion, was not a productive thing (and I agree with that). Extremism is
>> > rarely a useful attitude.
>>
>> What is extremist? Suggesting that Ballmer is committing crimes? he does. We
>> saw court evidence. Criticising a company for coordinated abuse which is
>> organised up above? Why not? If not here, where else?
I think you should state this in a newspaper and open yourself to legal
action. You really take the biscuit.
>
> How about:
>
> First 911
> Now 235
> Microsoft is the new Al-Qaeda
>
> You don't think that is extremist?
>
>> [H]omer's posts are both powerful and eloquent. They are among my favourite
>> because they bluntly state the truth without stereotypes, racism, or
>> insults.
No. They do not state the truth. They are extremist and inflammatory.
>
> Is this what passes for powerful and eloquent in the UK?
>
> What part of "I don't own it" didn't you understand you stupid twat.
>
> Fuck off and take your bigotry with you.
>
> So you don't think calling a woman a "stupid twat" is an insult?
Well, Roy is one too....
|
|
