In article <1575915.p2Dk81s5Em@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Is there some reason [H]omer is to be immune from criticism? Waterskiddoo
> > attacked excessive zealotry in the advocacy of Linux, which in her
> > opinion, was not a productive thing (and I agree with that). Extremism is
> > rarely a useful attitude.
>
> What is extremist? Suggesting that Ballmer is committing crimes? he does. We
> saw court evidence. Criticising a company for coordinated abuse which is
> organised up above? Why not? If not here, where else?
How about:
First 911
Now 235
Microsoft is the new Al-Qaeda
You don't think that is extremist?
> [H]omer's posts are both powerful and eloquent. They are among my favourite
> because they bluntly state the truth without stereotypes, racism, or insults.
Is this what passes for powerful and eloquent in the UK?
What part of "I don't own it" didn't you understand you stupid twat.
Fuck off and take your bigotry with you.
So you don't think calling a woman a "stupid twat" is an insult?
--
--Tim Smith
|
|
