On Aug 24, 5:38 pm, Kier <val...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:55:00 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> > ____/ Mark Kent on Friday 24 August 2007 18:38 : \____
> >> (cue waterskidoo troll shouting "paranioa, conspiracy" and so on).
>
> > She attacked [H]omer, so she'll need to earn back the trust. Feeding scum (with
> > a proven track record) like 'Hadron' and 'DFS' while attacking altruism is
> > inexcusable.
>
> Is there some reason [H]omer is to be immune from criticism? Waterskiddoo
> attacked excessive zealotry in the advocacy of Linux, which in her
> opinion, was not a productive thing (and I agree with that). Extremism is
> rarely a useful attitude.
>
> --
> Kier
Homer is an ass and Roy Schestowitz is an even bigger ass.
One thing about Linux zealots, never try and argue with them
because they will gang up on you and discredit everything you speak.
It's ironic that the elite Linux advocates in comp.os.linux.advocacy
speak
endlessly about freedom but what it turns out to be is freedom from
their perspective.
Agree with them and all is well.
Disagree with the core group of losers (Homer, Roy, Mark, Poaster,
Linonut) and you
will immediately be labeled a troll.
Sick group this comp.os.linux.advocacy is.
Very sick.
|
|
