waterskidoo wrote:
>His posts are embarrassing IMHO because the hate and vitriol that emanate
>from him just serves to make him look like a crazy zealot.
Why does that matter to you? Maybe "hate and vitriol" are sometimes
appropriate. Just because you don't think so, doesn't make it so.
There's no reason for you to be attacking him. There's room for all
kinds of advocates.
>It does nobody any good
Says who?
>and it's obvious that he is narrow minded
>and will not accept anything but *his* view of things.
Even if so, what's your problem with that? Ironic, since you think
that *your* (ostensibly "moderate") view of things is the only
acceptable one.
|
|
