dapunka <dapunka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 7 Dec, 23:02, Hadron <hadronqu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > On 2007-12-07, Mark Kent <mark.k...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> I've just gotten off the phone. I received a "warning" for "getting that kind
>> >>> of traffic" (not sure if it's an insult of a compliment). I wish I'd called
>> >>> yesterday to sort this out.
>>
>> >> Interesting - you get a warning for being popular? Amazing...
>>
>> > Someone want to explain to Mark how bandwidth works?
>>
>> And "popular" while they're at it.
>
> Um, if so many people are accessing Roy's site that it's causing
> bandwidth problems, doesn't that qualify as "popular"?
>
> It's obviously screwing with you big time that Roy's evil site is
> getting so many hits. But surely you don't /have/ to be such a dick
> about it?
Try reading the thread.
|
|
