bugbuster <bugbuster@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:16:33 -0500, flatfish wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:10:48 -0500, bugbuster <bugbuster@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:25:19 -0500, flatfish wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:01:41 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
>>>>>IBM researchers build supercomputer-on-a-chip
>>>>
>>>> They also, for the most part, designed the engine for the Sony PS3.
>>>> Great technology, on paper, but typical "attach to IBM and fail" in
>>>> practice.
>>>>
>>>> IBM couldn't market a parachute to a person who just fell out of a
>>>> plane and had a wad of 100's in her hand ready to buy.
>>>
>>>Xbox360 and Wii also use IBM chips. I guess all game consoles will fail
>>>since they have attached themselves to IBM.
>>>
>>>Bug
>>
>> Only the ones where IBM takes a dog an pony show on the road, like they
>> did with the cell processor.
>
> Backpeddling.
>
> What dog and pony show was that? IBM certainly has adverstised the cell
> processor for their own machines but I wasn't aware that IBM was actively
> advertising the PS/3.
>
Microsoft's whole success was on the back of the IBM PC anyway.
Unfortunately, you're debating with an in-house troll and constant
nymshifter. By responding, you merely provide a platform for him to
post further nonsense in his efforts to seed search engines.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |
|
|