What if nVidia had an open source driver?
,----[ Quote ]
| A manufacturer of a very specific or less-known hardware pieces should also
| release the drivers as FOSS, because, then, it will be possible to improve or
| fix these drivers whenever needed. Of course, releasing a badly-written
| driver as FOSS is not good.
`----
http://my.opera.com/CrazyTerabyte/blog/2007/08/10/what-if-nvidia-had-an-open-source-driver
Related:
NVIDIA: Got Specifications?
,----[ Quote ]
| This past week AMD raised the Linux graphics bar by not only announcing their
| new fglrx graphics driver, which delivers Radeon HD 2000 support, immense
| performance improvements, and AIGLX, but it was accompanied by an
| announcement that they will be delivering specifications to the X.Org
| development community. These two announcements came after intense work
| internally at AMD and over a long period of time, but literally overnight it
| changed the minds of many Linux users on how they judge this company with its
| once notorious binary blob. AMD has really set a precedence for showing that
| a semiconductor company once criticized to no end with their proprietary
| software can update their views to assist and embrace the open-source Linux
| community while remaining competitive as a company in a triopoloy market.
| They have also thus reaffirmed that Linux is a viable desktop operating
| system. But the ball has now landed in NVIDIA's court. NVIDIA can either play
| ball by pushing forward with a similar effort, and then all of the big three
| GPU manufacturers would be cradling an open-source strategy, or they may find
| themselves in trouble down the road.
`----
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=831&num=1
Could AMD move open desktop Linux market?
,----[ Quote ]
| AMD’s recent move to fully support open source graphics could be the best
| news desktop Linux has had in a long time.
`----
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1427
|
|
