On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:11:24 -0500, flatfish wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:04:16 +0100, Hadron
> <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>mark.kent.is.owned@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>>> flatfish wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:34:31 -0000, Tim Smith
>>>> <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >On 2007-12-01, flatfish <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >> Places where stats are kept, people can vote and it's easy to see what
>>>> >> gets accepted and what gets plonked Roy Schestowitz can't hide his
>>>> >> SPAM and off topic, paranoid messages.
>>>> >
>>>> >The most interesting stat is his performance on propellor.com (formerly
>>>> >netscape.com), where he was *hired* because they were impressed by his
>>>> >Digg volume:
>>>> >
>>>> > 20437 stories submitted
>>>> > 100 stories voted to the homepage (0.49%)
>>>> >
>>>> >I wonder if they pay by the story, or just for the stories that get
>>>> >voted up? If the former, that could explain why he doesn't seem to care
>>>> >much about accuracy--several crappy stories will pay more than one good,
>>>> >useful, story.
>>>>
>>>> Looking at those stats it seems fairly reasonable to assume that they
>>>> pay by quantity not quality.
>>>>
>>>> FWIW Roy SPAMS
>>>
>>> Spamming is Roy's job.
>>>
>>>> the same exact stories to digg and COLA as well and
>>>> it's obvious he has the process automated
>>>
>>> He's not begin paid too well by spamming one NG. He's got to spam
>>> several places to earn a living, I suppose. Well, he's got to pay
>>> bills and then pay Mark Kent his share for going through his network.
>>> And lets not forget the creepy thing between Roy and Mark Kent's sons.
>>> That might be involving money too.
>>
>>Don't forget the money rolling in from "modelling" for that Dutch guy's
>>creepy collages of his OSS "heroes". I suspect Marti might well wet his
>>panties if he sees those piccies of Roy all muscled up in front of the
>>mirror. Creepy isn't the word.
>
>
> Yea that's really sick.....
> YUCK!
It's also UNTRUE, flatty.
--
Kier
|
|
