On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:34:31 -0000, Tim Smith
<reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 2007-12-01, flatfish <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Places where stats are kept, people can vote and it's easy to see what
>> gets accepted and what gets plonked Roy Schestowitz can't hide his
>> SPAM and off topic, paranoid messages.
>
>The most interesting stat is his performance on propellor.com (formerly
>netscape.com), where he was *hired* because they were impressed by his
>Digg volume:
>
> 20437 stories submitted
> 100 stories voted to the homepage (0.49%)
>
>I wonder if they pay by the story, or just for the stories that get
>voted up? If the former, that could explain why he doesn't seem to care
>much about accuracy--several crappy stories will pay more than one good,
>useful, story.
Looking at those stats it seems fairly reasonable to assume that they
pay by quantity not quality.
FWIW Roy SPAMS the same exact stories to digg and COLA as well and
it's obvious he has the process automated which is against the TOS of
both Propellor and Digg.
|
|
