On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:03:54 -0500, flatfish wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:27:22 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>____/ Kier on Friday 30 November 2007 20:51 : \____
>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:44:25 +0000, Tim Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2007-11-30, Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Don't try and get smart, flatty. I was talking about CyberPhoenix.
>>>>
>>>> Hey, you are right. It looks like CyberPhoenix is gone. That was an
>>>> interesting one. It didn't comment much, but submitted a lot of stories
>>>> to the Linux section. They were almost always about Microsoft, but
>>>> never said "Microsoft". The usual term was "Abusive Monopolist".
>>>>
>>>> The summaries for those submissions usually looked like something 7
>>>> would write, if 7 decided to write actual English.
>>>
>>> Maybe it was him.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The few times CyberPhoenix did comment, the comment was in that style.
>>>> It would mention "Abusive Monopolist" and generally be incoherent.
>>>
>>> That doesn't really sound very much like Roy. He's usually reasonable
>>> coherent, for a start, if occasionally rather badly-spelled. And why use a
>>> nym? It's not his style.
>>
>>It's not me, but Timmy and the Gang (the COLA trolls came to Digg) repeated
>>this accusation time after time to create the Big Lie.
>>
>>End of story.
>
> Stop lying Roy.
> The format, the articles, the words in the posts, the Microsoft hate
> etc all match up perfectly with your style.
>
> And BTW if it wasn't you why does it no longer exist after you were
> outed?
> Coincidence?
> I don;t think so.
> You got caught and anyone looking up those articles in Google will
> spot your style a mile away.
And then you wonder how we catch *YOU*.
--
Kier
|
|
