GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability
,----[ Quote ]
| So what can we conclude from all this? Both license models make software
| free, but only GPL software is sustainably free. The BSD gives greater
| freedom, the GPL gives more freedom. Choose which one you value more.
`----
http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/15/gpl-vs-bsd-a-matter-of-sustainability/
Recent:
That Which We Call Free
,----[ Quote ]
| GNU Project and Free Software Foundation founder Richard Stallman posted a
| message on the OpenBSD -misc mailing list titled, "real men don't attack
| straw men", suggesting that some comments he had made were being
| misrepresented.
`----
http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/That_Which_We_Call_Free
Related:
SELinux vs. OpenBSD's Default Security
,----[ Quote ]
| Darrin Chandler suggested, "security should not be grafted on, it should be
| integrated into the main development process. I'm sure the patch maintainers
| are doing their best, but this doesn't change the fundamental flaw in the
| process. It's not a flaw of their making, it's inherent in the situation. But
| it's still a flaw."
`----
http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/SELinux_vs_OpenBSDs_Default_Security
Open Source coders caught stealing Open Source code
,----[ Quote ]
| Developers of OpenBSD took code from their brethren at Linux, violating
| the code's licence, the GPL. To the horror of the Linux folk, the
| OpenBSD licence allows proprietary use.
`----
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746
|
|
