* thad05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx fired off this tart reply:
> My point was not about cost, but which operating system is best
> suited for the fast growing lightweight desktop / sub-notebook
> market. From a purely performance standpoint, Linux is
> obviously a better fit than Vista. License cost is just just
> icing on the cake.
More icing:
Little or no DRM.
Much more configurable. Incredibly more configurable.
Far better application installation system(s).
Source installs available.
Easier to fix.
--
Tux rox!
|
|
