Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: information technology specialist ..

Jim Richardson wrote:
 
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:07:42 -0800,
>  Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:15:19 -0500,
>>  Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:52:31 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Can you give an example?
>>>> 
>>>> sure, the whole focus follows mouse debacle from a couple years ago.
>>>> You went from "you cant do that and alt-tab" to "you can configure
>>>> windowmaker to not do that" and it took you ages of hedgine and
>>>> bullshiting your way from one to t'other. That one was particularly
>>>> amusing to me, as it took me apporx 30 sec to disprove your original
>>>> claim. Watching the dancing you did after that was icing on the cake.
>>>
>>> I barely remember that situation, but my recollection is that the only
>>> reason it "took ages" is because at the time I didn't have a working
>>> Linux partition to verify, and I stated several times to put the
>>> discussion on hold until I did.
>>>
>>> After I had a working Linux partition, I proved my point, though I did
>>> admit to being wrong about all versions of FFM.  IIRC, you were putting
>>> words in my mouth back then too.  You kept claiming I said things "can't
>>> be done" or that "X doesn't allow", when I never said such things.
>>>
>>
>> - From  Message-ID: <u58n2ihaagpb51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>><quote>
>>
>> Focus follows point is very annoying if you want to use the keyboard,
>> since the mouse forces focus elsewhere, you can't switch windows using
>> keyboard shortucts.
>>
>></quote>
>>
> 
> No responce Erik?
 
>>>> Everyone makes errors, I certainly do, and that's not being dishonest.
>>>
>>> Yet everytime *I* make one, everytime I admit to them, you still
>>> continue
>>> to call me a liar about them, even 5+ years after the fact.  You simply
>>> cannot accept it when someone makes a mistake, you have to keep grinding
>>> their nose in it for years and years.
>>>
>>> Is it any wonder I dislike admitting when I make mistakes, people like
>>> yourself simply will not accept it and will continue to call me a liar.
>>
>> False, I drop things when you've admitted a mistake, see the root
>> 'sploit threads of yore. I sometimes don't see a message in where you
>> admit the mistake, like the msttcorefonts claims you made, you did admit
>> that your claim that you couldn't use them on non-MS platforms was false
>> right?
>>
> 
> No reponce Erik?
 
>>>
>>>> We all have bad moments, say stupid shit, and have to face the world
>>>> afterwards. Either you have a lot of those moments, or you have a
>>>> disproportionate number of yours here, or you are flinging fud and
>>>> misleading people.
>>>
>>> Tell me.  Have you ever seen me bring up a 5+ year old argument in here?
>>> Ever?  I'd say the Fud comes from you.
>>
>> Fud like your claims that the GPL can't be considered valid because
>> sometime in the future it might be struck down?
>>
> 
> No responce Erik?
> 

And Erik *still* claims that the Morris worm spread via email.
He should by now know better, as he has been corrected literally dozens of
times, often with links explaining the worm. Yet he still keeps repeating
that lie

And then he wonders why he is held accountable for years old claims. It is
simply because he in his infinite dishonesty keeps repeating them instead
of admitting that he was wrong
-- 
Windows: Because everyone needs a good laugh!


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index