On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:26:08 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] on Wednesday 07 February 2007 22:22
> \__
>
>
>>> Microsoft Windows: Insecure by Design
>>>
>>>
>> Roy, how bout this one:
>>
>>
> http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisemac/archives/2006/08/is_windows_inhe.html
>>
>> Compares Mac and Windows security
>
> Haven't looked at it yet, but there's plenty of evidence to suggest that
> Windows is simply insecure by design. The evidence is very scientific,
> too.
Windows: Insecure by design -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34978-2003Aug23?language=printer
> One could go about with the R&D pitch, but changing hundreds of millions
> of LOCs to secure an O/S is impossible. Teams require collaboration, so
> money is no substitute for /time/. That's why Apple decided to choose a
> mature BSD. If Microsoft does not do the same (they have Novell, despite
> the FSF), then its only hope is Singularity of 'Winux'.
--
Contrary to popular belief, trolls *can*
tell the difference between their arse
& their elbow.
They can't talk out of their elbow.
|
|
