-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:22:35 -0800,
Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <pan.2007.02.17.17.16.25.574811@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Maybe so, but your bothering to count all this just to make an attack Roy
>> isn't exactly stellar behaviour, is it? I'd like to see all the yap about
>> Windows/Vista/MS cut down a good deal, but you won't get anywhere by
>> posting stupid stuff like this.
>
> So, you'd like to see all that yap cut down, but you don't want to
> discuss how much yap there is?
>
>
I think he's simply pointing out that Erik is acting a bit obsessive...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF112+d90bcYOAWPYRAm9rAKDKqscMFr+ctwaAJKn8jybF2OKztwCguhe9
jd1coW7IwKdesTFzG77fEUQ=
=D2jl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged
demo.
|
|