Doug Mentohl wrote:
> on the Mydoom DOS attack on SCO which started before the payload was
> triggered.
>
> "There are computers with incorrect clock settings that may already be
> firing off an attack"
>
> "'I have proof right here in my suitcase,' says Gregory Blepp, Vice
> President of SCO and responsible for the licensing business."
>
>
http://trends.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/04/14/228259&tid=147&tid=29&tid=31
>
> "Oh, he no longer works for us,", Blake Stowell
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20040819062642232
>
> "There are Internet service providers around the world who are blocking
> access to SCO", Blake Stowell
>
> "IBM is barred from trying to enforce the GPL with SCO", , Blake Stowell
>
> "Many software vendors have approached SCO to try and find a way to change
> the GPL", Blake Stowell
>
> On the non-existant MIT team of Experts ..
>
> âat least one of the groups was a link to MITâ, Blake Stowell
>
> "There's line-by-line code. There's obfuscated code as well,", Blake
> Stowell
Hey! I remember SCO, weren't they big once or am I getting mixed up with the
pop song D.I.S.C.O?
The really smart thing after SCO took advice and no doubt a jolly good bung
somewhere along the line, only to find that when they fell face down in the
cowpats of life MS were nowhere to be seen, no one holding SCO's coat for
them, no one with a damp cloth for them. Mates, where would we be without
them. (just occured that we'd be up to our knecks in kids, but I don't know
if that quip is valid outside Britland).
Novell then thought that MS could be trusted enough to deal with, take a
vote shall we, if Novell head under over this will MS come and help them
up,
Yes or No
Delete as appropriate.
It's ok, don't bother to vote we know the result really.
|
|
