-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
RonB wrote:
>> Ah, but that's working from the assumption that he actually wants his
>> "problem" fixed. I see no supporting evidence for that particular
>> assumption, and quite a few indications to the exact opposite.
>
> I don't know about this particular poster, but I think the reason so
> many WinTrolls are frothing about Roy's news posts is that they keep
> the signal to noise ratio higher than they want it to be. It tends to
> defeat their purpose for coming here.
Indeed, so let me rephrase. He does want his problem fixed, but the
actual problem he has is not the one stated.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFz55Ad1ZThqotgfgRAntSAKCUH+36kfzSC3ALaA2uRPEIAGbiGgCeJb5M
EnkQ1ir204n12m19w4mRtIE=
=LUkM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
PeKaJe
Never drink from your finger bowl -- it contains only water.
|
|
