So anyway, it was like, 11:40 CET Feb 23 2007, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
Erik Funkenbusch was all like, "Dude,
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:17:15 +0100, Johan Lindquist wrote:
>> So anyway, it was like, 23:12 CET Feb 22 2007, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
>> Erik Funkenbusch was all like, "Dude,
>>> Even if your quote said what Roy's headline did (which it
>>> doesn't), Roy is still making a fraudulent headline.
>>
>> Er, so, even if it wasn't actually wrong, as headlines go, it was
>> still fradulent? I'm not commenting on whether the article said or
>> didn't say what you think it didn't say, I'm just curious about
>> your logic. As usual, it's somewhat fuzzy - at least to me.
>
> Peter quoted a different article.
One which I'm sure you know for a fact Roy wasn't aware of at the
time. And if he was, I'm sure it somehow was out of context and his
headline was still 'fradulent'. Well, it's all clear now.
--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
11:50:50 up 106 days, 9:32, 4 users, load average: 0.07, 0.06, 0.06
Linux 2.6.18.1 x86_64 GNU/Linux Registered Linux user #261729
|
|
