__/ [ Philip ] on Wednesday 10 January 2007 00:36 \__
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> Firefox or Internet Explorer? Why Not Both?
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Ironically, the release of IE 7, which I consider first rate, seems
>> | to be prompting a significant number of people to take a look at
>> | the competing free browser from Mozilla.org called "Firefox" that
>> | now is offering its 2.0.1 version.
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/55047.html
>
> "Use them both...There's an awful lot to be gained by going through the
> refreshingly simple download and installation of Firefox 2 and running
> it alongside IE, which comes installed as part of Windows.
>
> I use one of the browsers for serious research and study while using the
> other browser when I get involved in stuff that seems at the leading
> edge and that might mess up the current session."
>
> What a dope. Use Firefox for both sessions...it never crashes. If you're
> really risk adverse use FF, Mozilla, Seamonkey and Opera. No need for
> IE7 at all.
Even if it ever did crash, there's sht SessionSaver extension, which I
believe an equivalent of which is not built into FF2. It's a browser, not a
girlfriend. One powerful browser is all one needs to keep the data (e.g.
cookies, bookmarks) aligned, without need for extensions for remote
centralisation of this data.
--
~~ Best regards
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
7:00am up 83 days 17:14, 6 users, load average: 0.50, 0.44, 0.38
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
|
|
