Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Bad Suse Experience

  • Subject: Re: Bad Suse Experience
  • From: flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:05:58 -0500
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: mariana.trench
  • References: <9vadnU0g67Z8YAPYnZ2dnUVZ_qninZ2d@speakeasy.net> <-K-dnXT3u9z8uQLYnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@comcast.com> <459FA6D6.2070607@bullet3.fsnet.oc.ku> <2479711.WamrsUZCM6@schestowitz.com>
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:477629
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:06:01 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> __/ [ Robert Newson ] on Saturday 06 January 2007 13:38 \__
> 
>> Michel Catudal wrote:
>> 
>>> Le Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:39:43 -0800, John A. Bailo a ÃÂcrità :
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>I put my Suse 10.1 system on "lock".
>> ...
>>> I had a somewhat similar problem and it seemed to be tied to the gnome
>>> screensaver. After removing that trojan
>> 
>> The problem could be that, despite what Novell say, SUSE is KDE biased (and
>> based?) and it's really a half-hearted nod towards Gnome.
> 
> Some speculate that it's gearing up toward Mono, with some 'lovely' Windows
> compatibility. Add some Wine and let Microsoft just nick the stable kernel
> that thousands have been banging on for 15 years.
> 
> Speculations.


You Linux boobs complain about everything.
What about the outcry a few years ago when Suse was dropping hints that it
might go gnome based?
Now that it remains kde based, after the smoke cleared, you complain about
that.

What a bunch of whiners the Linux community is.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index