On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:22:20 -0800, Larry Qualig wrote:
>
> Jerry McBride wrote:
>> flatfish+++ wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:46:48 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> >
>> >> __/ [ Tattoo Vampire ] on Wednesday 03 January 2007 16:05 \__
>> >>
>> >>> Larry Qualig wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I read the entire article. Nowhere in the article does the reviewer
>> >>>> "bash" Vista or the laptop. So why are you lying again?
>> >>>
>> >>> The writer does have a few dislikes about the OS:
>> >>>
>> >>> #1:
>> >>> Maybe the dialog should be a bit more cautious. Just because I started a
>> >>> program doesn't mean it's safe to run it.
>> >>>
>> >>> #2:
>> >>> To be honest, I wasn't that impressed with Vista's Aero windowing
>> >>> system. Yes, the 3-D with shadowing stuff is nice and yes the
>> >>> semi-transparent windows are cool, but for me it's no big-deal
>> >>> improvement over XP's windows. We'll see if this judgment holds over the
>> >>> month.
>> >>>
>> >>> #3:
>> >>> If truth be told, my first app install on Vista didn't go entirely
>> >>> smoothly.
>> >>>
>> >>> Not much criticism at all from the writer...
>> >>
>> >> ...Who receive a free laptop owing to his status. Microsoft flip-flopping
>> >> on its return policy won't help here. When you send someone a $3000
>> >> laptop, you expect little or no criticism. The review is also biased
>> >> because of the hardware specs. The the equivalent of taking a test drive
>> >> with Sylvia Saint giving you a blowjob.
>> >
>> > Dance Roy "Bojangles" Schestowitz!!!
>> > Dance!!!!
>> >
>> > (Notice Roy Schestowitz evading the subject?)
>> >
>> > So where does the review bash Vista/laptop?
>> >
>> > You still have not answered the question.
>> >
>> > Face it Roy Schestowitz, you have been caught lying yet again.
>> >
>> > You may be a Grade A SPAMMER Roy Schestowitz, but you are a Grade F liar.
>>
>>
>
>> Well... where did the guy PRAISE it? No where...
>
> There is no requirement for the reviewer to "PRAISE" Vista in order to
> prove Roy to be a liar. He only need not BASH it for Roy's statement to
> be false.
>
>
>> In fact, it was more negative than positive
>> and as Roy reported it DEAD ON.
>
> "It was more negative than positive" basically means that it was
> "neutral." A neutral review is not not even a negative review and it is
> absolutely not a review that BASHES a product. Thank you for your
> confirmation that Roy Schestowitz is a dishonest liar.
>
>
>
>> Thanks for the post, Roy. I'll be looking forward to see how unbiased this
>> vista review goes...
>
> Slurp, slurp.
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
