High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Larry Qualig wrote:
> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
> >
> >> What does discussing Roy's outside activities have to do with
> >> advocating Linux?
> >
> > You should ask Roy since he was the one who started this when he posted
> > the: "Microsoft Spreads FUD in Digg.com, Using its MVP's" thread.
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/browse_frm/
> > thread/ab5d29de8a28d6f0/3219d01fbfabf3b0?lnk=gst&q=microsoft+spread+
> > fud+in+digg.com&rnum=1&hl=en#3219d01fbfabf3b0
> >
> > Turns out that this was yet another lie from Roy Schestowitz because
> > the facts prove that the MVP named by Roy posts very little about
> > Microsoft.
> >
> > The next lie from Roy Schestowitz was to check out his comments because
> > his comments are somehow pro-Microsoft FUD. Once again, the facts prove
> > that Roy Schestowitz was lying again.
> >
> > So Roy made several claims that this MVP is spreading FUD on Digg.com
> > and has yet to show a single example to back up his claim. The a sane
> > individual, it would appear that it is Roy Schestowitz who is spreading
> > FUD by falsely blaming this guy for something he clearly didn't do.
>
> I looked at the thread you quoted above, which started with your Post No.
> 11. Then I went to what Roy said prior to your post in Post No. 1. Most
> of his posts are excerpts quoted from referenced web pages. He stated an
> observation:
The "link" here is to the on-line BIO of the poster. The
comment/observation is his.
> | Source:
> |
> | searchwin2000.techtarget.com/ateExpertBio/0,289623,sid1_cid394091,00.html
> |
> | 2,800+ stories submitted to Digg, mainly ones favouring Microsoft.
> | Microsoft may be buying an army of loyalists to intervene with technology
> | news. There are at least two other people which systematically defend
> | Micorsoft and apologise for everything.
> Is this what you are referring to as a lie?
What would you call this? (There's also the subsequent post where he
claims this guy is a paid shill but let's keep it simple and just focus
on this.)
The fact is that out of the 2800+ stories there are very few that favor
Microsoft. There are even some that express a negative view on
Microsoft. When pressed further on this Roy then went on to claim that
(paraphrase) - 'Okay, maybe the stories aren't pro-Microsoft. But his
comments are.'
Well, it turns out that his comments also have very little to do with
Microsoft, either for or against. So why did Roy start a thread about
how this guy is a paid shill for Microsoft and how he posts 2800+
stories if this isn't the case?
Remember, this isn't just some comment he made up out of the blue. It's
the subject of a thread that he (Roy) started. The entire foundation
for this thread is based on false information. (ie - This guy is a paid
shill for MSFT who posts thousands of pro-MS stories.)
> >> Get a clue, will yah.
> >
> > Likewise. Or do you wish to backup Roys lies?
>
> Hmmmh ..... interesting insinuation ..... How do I know you aren't part of
> those 2,800 posts? :-)
>
> --
> HPT
|
|
