It was on or about Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:07:24 +0100, that Peter Köhlmann
wrote:
> Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <pan.2007.01.01.15.11.26.249445@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> As PK said, was linux mentioned in the description? No, it was about an
>>> opensource software browser (which *can* be used on either platform)
>>> running on windoze, but Smith just had to jump on linux, the tosser.
>>
>> How is linking to an article that shows the IE and Firefox both suck at
>> the Acid 2 test Linux advocacy?
>>
>>
> Because the MS browsers (all, without exception) fail the test While for
> example KDEs browser passes
>
> How come when OSS is developed by unwashed uncombed nerds, according to
> flatfish?
>
> And BTW, it was you who mistakenly claimed that "both windows and linux"
> failed. You were wrong. Windows failed
You have to wonder why Smith replies to someone in whose kf he resides,
OTOH trolls tend to do that...
--
A computer lets you make more mistakes faster
than any invention in human history, installing
Windoze was one of them. As they say at Microsoft -
'What do you want to reinstall today ?'.
|
|
