On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:32:19 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <4277705.akaHCyyWOy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Miss the point, at least post an article from him that supports your
>> > argument, it doesn't make you look like a shill instead of him....
>>
>> I see these articles on a daily basis (last seen an hour ago). These are post
>> under the technology section (Microsoft stuff in particular). That stuff is
>> being drowned among a pile of garbage/dross that fits other themes.
>
> So, you've retreated from claiming he's posting 2800+ FUD items, to he's
> posting some FUD, and a bunch of non-technology stuff that drowns it
> out. Well, let's take a look at his last week's submissions to the
> Technology section, shall we?
>
> ---------------------------
> Microsoft may take on iTV at CES in January
> 1st New Year worm on the loose
> The people behind the online mapping software - or who killed James Kim
> Top 10 girl geeks
> Top Ten Security Threats for 2007
> Audacity 1.3 beta available
> New Microsoft Windows CSRSS Information Disclosure Vulnerability
> 2006 dubbed the "Year of the Zombies"
> What is Scrapo.com?
> How to Hack Vista's ReadyBoost
> Apple shares seesaw again
> The Best of Web 2.0 - Digg makes the cut
> Powershell script to append a file
> Ten tech trends for 2007
> Digg Has A Problem With SEO
> Visto Awarded $7.7 Million in Damages
> How to: Adobe v8 install using customization tool
> The battle of the SMS 2003 books
> Restarting Services via WMI
> 20 best PC downloads for 2007
> The Year in Online Video
> Security Watch: Firefox flaws
> Can God Save Internet Explorer?
> AOL blocks communications on Port 25
> Digger sells your vote
> New Digg Option Lets Podcasters Get More Traffic, Money
> Video News: Red Hat on a run
> Amazon Launches New Q&A Service
> Amateurs reach for high-end digital cameras
> Got Monitoring? Pingdom Has It
> ---------------------------
>
> Note that there are at least 7 there that would be right at home on an
> anti-Microsoft site, out of 30.
>
> So...first it was his 2800+ submissions. When you were shown to be wrong
> about that, it was his comments. When you were shown to be wrong about
> that, it was his submissions in Technology. Now you've been shown to be
> wrong about that, too. Care to revise your claim yet again?
Hahahaha!
Roy Schestowitz caught lying again....
Gee, what a surprise!
You think he would have learned his lesson about copyright infringement as
well.
I think our boi Roi is jus plain sour.
|
|
