Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> cc wrote:
>
> >
> > Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> >> [snips]
> >>
> >> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:05:14 +0000, Kier wrote:
> >>
> >> > And the trolls *still* have the lying gall to suggest Linux advocates
> >> > think Linux is 'perfect'.
> >>
> >> Funny, ain't it. If you admit Linux isn't perfect - what is? - they harp
> >> on it as being buggy and flawed; if you don't admit it isn't perfect,
> >> they accuse you of, in effect, being deluded.
> >>
> >> Nice double standard they have. Wonder if they might try something
> >> breathtakingly refreshing, like, say, honesty for a change.
> >>
> >> Nah, never happen.
> >
> > Double standard works both ways. Why do you expect perfection from a
> > Microsoft product?
>
> Because you widiots claim that it "just works"
> Which in reality should be translated to "barely works"
Uhh I've seen *plenty* of people around here claiming Linux just works.
I guess I've seen a few of the Windows just works posts here too. So, I
guess I don't understand your point. I don't think either side was
claiming perfection with that statement. Which Microsoft product barely
works anyway? Also you state that I said a Microsoft product just
works, which I never have, so please stop grouping me in with your
ficticious widiots.
|
|
