-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:57:06 -0600,
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:02:34 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> Microsoft Breaks HTML Email Rendering in Outlook 2007
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| If support for web standards in browsers is improving slowly,
>>| then support in email clients is moving at a glacial pace.
>>| Attempts to document things like CSS support in the major
>>| email clients have revealed a depressing state of affairs,
>>| but with recent desktop clients like Thunderbird now sitting
>>| on solid rendering engines, things have been looking up.
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/01/10/microsoft-breaks-html-email-rendering-in-outlook/
>
> Wait, I thought monocultures were bad, and having multiple implementations
> of something was considered good?
It is, that's why you stick to well known and ppen standards, like imap,
webdav, and use whatever client you want, rather than tying yourself to
Outlook and Mapi (gods how I've come to loathe outlook)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFpr+fd90bcYOAWPYRAqQCAKDifdLP7YPszZTRPduycazAZFFmawCeLq6V
1z4DdoXu9XiDD9oLMEz/1RE=
=rY4z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
If you think you can tell me what to think,
I think I will tell you where to go
|
|
