__/ [ Peter Köhlmann ] on Wednesday 31 January 2007 21:54 \__
> Ian Semmel wrote:
>
>> Logically, it is impossible to argue a negative.
>
> It is your problem if you can't argue away windows many failings
>
>> However, this is what the so-called advocates in this ng are trying to do.
>> The majority of posts are negative treatises on windows. The articles may
>> be correct, but this in no way "advocates" linux.
>>
>
> Actually, it does. This NG is to compare the benfits of linux to other OS.
> If the other OS is a steaming pile of garbage like windows is, the better
> for linux in comparison. See? Advocacy. You just don't like it, but that is
> entirely your problem
>
>> Arguments here usually take the following form :
>>
>> This object is not an apple.
>> Therefore, it is an orange.
>
> Your analogies are even worse than Erik Fs. And that twit makes real crappy
> ones
>
>> The newsgroup's resident spammer, Roy Schestowitz,
>
> He is not spamming. He posts (a lot) of advocacy articles. Too bad for you
> when your beloved toy-OS fares so extremely badly in some of those
>
>> is obsessed with Vista,
>> posting hundreds of messages about it every week. I think he should go out
>> and buy a few copies, as it is a well-known fact that only by confronting
>> one's fears can they be overcome.
>
> Idiot
+1
|
|
