OK wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:49:32 +0100, Peter KÃhlmann
> <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>OK wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:17:45 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Windows Vista: Bad usability and navigation?
>>>>
>>>>,----[ Quote ]
>>>>| This style of button is present on all Vista windows and programs, as
>>>>| far as I have seen. This is a huge loss of usability to the Windows
>>>>| Vista interface.
>>>>`----
>>>>
>>>>http://www.designerkev.com/blog/technology/windows-vista-bad-usability-and-navigation/
>>>>http://tinyurl.com/2xlkmf
>>>
>>> "Let me begin by stating that I have not used Windows Vista, and I
>>> have not seen it in person."
>>>
>>> This is a joke, right?
>>
>>Why, exactly? You have not seen, used or even personally know someone
>>using linux. And feel competent to post in a linux group
>
> The joke is the guy writes about a non-existent, totally imaginary
> flaw in Vista UI without even having seen the UI in question. He
> invents "huge losses of useability" that simply do not exists, windows
> on Aero can be closed just as always. This is really funny.
>
> For my part, I even had to *use* that pile of crap that you call
> Linux. It was some "Mandriva" distribution and I had the joy of
> editing C++ code with an antediluvian text editor called "emacs". The
> whole experience was very traumatizing. I learned enough about this OS
> and its developement toolset to be able to *very* convincingly
> discourage anyone to use it.
Certainly. As everybody (and his cat, naturally) knows that you absolutely
have to use Emacs.
Pull another one. Somewhat more convincing this time
--
The Day Microsoft makes something that does not suck is probably
the day they start making vacuum cleaners.
|
|
