Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: <header> Validation Problems - Has the W3C Validator Changed?

In article 
<1169475751.090620.86190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A million thanks to all of you for the reply.
> 
> I added that single line of XHTML about 3 weeks ago and totally forgot
> about validation. I do almost everything in XHMTL nowadays and I just
> couldn't sense (at the time) that I was 'mixing'. Speaking of which,
> YouTube and Google Video (among others) are a bummer if you do XHTML,
> which only justifies the claims made by many that XHTML is a bad idea
> from the get-go.
> 
> I have corrected the error, I am aware of other design errors in my
> coding (very old page) and again I'd like to thank all of you. The
> error reported by the validator just weren't most informative for
> reasons that Toby explained very well.
> 
> Noteworthy is the fact that I kind of miss alt.html. I just don't find
> the time to hang around here anymore.
> 
> Best wishes!

I know you don't mean to, but you make people like me look bad by 
being so nice. Please stop.

-- 
dorayme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index