On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:45:03 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> In article <n5nb84-jpm.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> For the record, Roy's postings are very welcome, and are on topic and
>>> not anti-charter.
>>>
>>> The posts are appreciated by a great number of people, including myself
>>> and many many others.
>>>
>>> I say again, please Roy, keep up this great advocacy work. This group
>>
>> Do you consider Roy's lying about rodtrent's Digg submissions to be (1)
>> on-topic for this group, or (2) Linux advocacy?
>>
>
> Here is your open answer:
>
> As I have no knowledge of this beyond what Roy (who is typically honest)
> has said and you (who typically post anti-charter material here) have
> said, then I would tend to assume that unless proven otherwise, Roy is
> most likely to be truthful, you are most likely to be at best unethical,
> at worst, quite disingenuous.
Yea sure.
Bury your head in the sand and attack the poster.
Typical crazy Linux zealot.
Try answering the question next time.........
Hint: It's about Roy, not Tim, not myself, Roy.
Roy Schestowitz is a liar and that gets proven every single day.
|
|
