Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: PGP encryption was modified by the NSA

  • Subject: Re: PGP encryption was modified by the NSA
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:31:16 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <Iv6dnfrMmPppRDbYnZ2dnUVZ_ojinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <1168895400.051098.286890@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1168951414.264668.132760@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <4484411.NPbn3DVLUz@schestowitz.com> <sR7rh.2704$hi7.1444@trnddc08>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Mateus Denigris ] on Tuesday 16 January 2007 17:22 \__

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2007-01-16, Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>> __/ [ Doug Mentohl ] on Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:43 \__
>>
>>> on Jan 15 2007 21:10 Rex Ballard wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You would probably have to go back to Visicalc ..
>>> 
>>> Do you have any reference or citation for the NSA getting PGP modified
>>> ..
>>> 
>>>
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3884f5d59e7e45c3?hl=en&;
>>
>> Yes, I'd still like to know about this myself. PGP is heavility used in
>> transimission protocols which are supposedly secure.
> 
> This is the old "can the spooks do this?" routine. The reality is that we
> have no idea what the various shadow organizations can do and what they
> can't or for that matter, to what degree they even take an interest in any
> given data or person(s). The big one used to be if blowfish and twofish
> remain uncracked and secure against intrusion by these organizations. Who
> knows? Are they going to tell? No. We can make educated guesses based on
> what we think we know. The creator of blowfish now emphasizes *access*
> security and secure *habits*. This is because the real question is not how
> secure is your encryption, but what is it that you are willing to devote to
> encryption, and who has access to the encrypted data.
> 
> The other obvious point is, do they care? Homeland security might peek at
> email on a random basis, but do they monitor your IP address? Unless you
> have some red flags attached to your person, probably not.
> 
> GPG is a great application of crypto. It's strong encryption, and fits most
> needs just fine. If you are concerned about using it to send very sensitive
> data across the internet, Don't do it. There are other tools for getting
> your information to others securely.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Mateus

Damn....

         Chinese Prof Cracks SHA-1 Data Encryption Scheme

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/20/1936257&from=rss

Now just imagine the impact.


-- 
                        ~~ Best wishes 

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    "These characters were randomly picked"
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer ¦  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 0.81 0.71 0.84 7/132 30672
      http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index