Re: [News] Kubuntu Linux Reviewed; KDE-based PCLOS Takes #1 Position in DW

[ml2mst <ml2mst@xxxxxxxxx>]

Roy Schestowitz schreef:
> ____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 10 July 2007 14:40 : \____
>
> > waterskidoo <water.skidoo@xxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> > > On 2007-07-09, Hadron Quark <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > PClinuxos is far better than Ubuntu, IMHO!!!
> > > > On what criteria is it "far better"?
> > > All the multimedia stuff is installed by default.
> > > All the other system partitions are mounted and icons
> > > set up in the konqueror explorer.
> > > The menu layout is better.
> > > The control panel is better.
> > > The base install of applications seems better to me.
> > > PClinuxos is faster on the same machine than Ubuntu.
> > > And other things like that.
> > >
> > > > And so you can't installe KDE in Ubuntu or what? There's even a "KDE
> > > > ready" install for people who dont want to use synaptic.
> > > Kubuntu is out there but it has been buggy in the past although that
> > > may have changed. Yes you can install kde and so forth into Ubuntu but
> > > that's extra steps.
> > > I find PClinuxos to be a better distribution for me.
> > > Others may disagree and nobody can deny Ubuntu's popularity.
> > > It comes down to personal preference.
> > > Also I have not tried the very latest Ubuntu so maybe things have
> > > changed.
> > Just in case you weren't aware, Mr Quark is one of our resident
> > wintrolls.  He goes through phases of trying to appear "reasonable", but
> > they never last for very long.
> Never feed that Hadron troll. Some people still do. It's one of the lowest
> forms of scum here and it's a contender that can replace flatfish+++ as most
> twitted poster.
Exactly! I felt for his *being not so evil* as well, but caught his 
sneaky ways in alt.os.linux.ubuntu last night.
For some weird reason Google groups, can't help me to link to the topic:

Newsreader Poll on Ubuntu Forums.

Now just look at what he writes:

> > Why do you need a poll for that? A perl script could retrieve all
> > statistics, like that your reader is "slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux)"

> *Do you have some links to such scripts?*

Now why would our true Linux advocate want links to those scripts?

Probably to attack the authors of the COLA stats script again (just a 
guess) :-)
Jeez, what a sneaky little bastard!
--
|_|0|_| Registered Linux user #394093
|_|_|0| http://counter.li.org
|0|0|0| http://ml2mst.topcities.com