After takin' a swig o' grog, anon@xxxxxxxx belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
>> Linonut on Sunday 29 July 2007 02:54
>>> anon@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Can we dispense with the immature silliness in the attribution
> lines?
Why?
After takin' a swig o' grog, anon@xxxxxxxx belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>>>> We believe that linux has eaten into unix sales and that's about
>>>> it and if that's the case, linux is ultimately only
>>>> cannibalizing itself. We doubt that many people who want
>>>> windoze would settle for anything else.
>
>>> I get it now. You are a Microsoft bot. Well, not really. No
>>> bot would insert so many cover-your-ass provisos into its
>>> statements.
>
> Can you give us an example of a so-called "cover-your-ass provisos"
> in the above statements? Or is this just name-calling?
"if" --> "cover your ass"
>>People who prefer not to identify themselves pretty much tell you
>>what they are worth and what they think their posts are worth.
>
> Well, our name is Ron Matthews, if that is your complaint. Simply
> do a google search on cordially, as always, and you'll have our
> name.
"Our"?
You seem to be yet another poster who adopts a stuffy, polite manner,
while emitting insinuations and patronization, not to mention some real
hokum.
--
Tux rox!
|
|
