The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> Dr. Fafoofnik wrote
>> "High Plains Thumper" wrote...
>>> spike1 wrote:
>>>> Dr. Fafoofnik scribble:
>>>>
>>>>> Great review. I absolutely love the screen shots of Scribus.
>>>>
>>>>> Clearly it is the WINDOWS version that's being reviewed because the
>>>>> linux version is buggy as hell and doesn't even run because of
>>>>> missing package dependencies!
>>>>
>>>> Only if you're one of the clueless or a troll deliberately doing
>>>> things wrong to make things look bad.
>>>>
>>>> Scribus works here, because I simple MADE SURE MY DEPENDENCIES WERE
>>>> MET!
>>>>
>>>> Wow what a concept.
>>>
>>> I use synaptic in Debian and Ubuntu. Any dependencies are pointed out
>>> during selection. If one continues, dependent files are installed
>>> along with the application. Aptitude does the same.
>>
>> So it's your position that they reviewed the linucks version of scribus
>> and not the version for Windows. Blind and stupid is no way to go
>> through life son.
>
> Of course. Everyone should just buy Microsoft Office anyway. Not only
> does it represent good value for Microsoft's shareholders, but
> it's...um....erm....ah....really really gorgeous. Yeah, that'll do it.
There is nothing wrong with the Linux version. The nymshifting doctor,
AKA linux-sux@xxxxxxxxx is misrepresenting the truth.
>>> Dr. Fafoofnik, AKA linux-sux@xxxxxxxxx, is deliberately
>>> misrepresenting the truth.
>>
>> I am many things and linux does suck. But that's not my alias.
Dr. has difficulty in expressing the truth, point not taken.
--
HPT
|
|
