In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Dr. Fafoofnik
<rmiller@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:21:11 -0400
<46a1373f$0$22028$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> "High Plains Thumper" <highplainsthumper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:pan.2007.07.20.23.03.12.125000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> spike1 wrote:
>>> Dr. Fafoofnik did eloquently scribble:
>>>> Great review. I absolutely love the screen shots of Scribus.
>>>
>>>> Clearly it is the WINDOWS version that's being reviewed because the
>>>> linux version is buggy as hell and doesn't even run because of missing
>>>> package dependencies!
>>>
>>> Only if you're one of the clueless or a troll deliberately doing things
>>> wrong to make things look bad.
>>>
>>> Scribus works here, because I simple MADE SURE MY DEPENDENCIES WERE MET!
>>>
>>> Wow what a concept.
>>
>> I use synaptic in Debian and Ubuntu. Any dependencies are pointed out
>> during selection. If one continues, dependent files are installed along
>> with the application. Aptitude does the same.
>
> So it's your position that they reviewed the linucks version of scribus and
> not the version for Windows. Blind and stupid is no way to go through life
> son.
Of course. Everyone should just buy Microsoft Office anyway.
Not only does it represent good value for Microsoft's shareholders,
but it's...um....erm....ah....really really gorgeous. Yeah,
that'll do it.
>
>
>> Dr. Fafoofnik, AKA
>> linux-sux@xxxxxxxxx, is deliberately misrepresenting the truth.
>
> I am many things and linux does suck. But that's not my alias.
>
Of course Linux sucks. Windows, OTOH, just blows. :-P
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Error 16: Not enough space on file system to delete file(s)
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
