On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 03:20:27 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Kier ] on Sunday 03 June 2007 21:08 \__
>
>> On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:14:29 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>> In article <slrnf65jrd.4eg.linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> > It's apparently working well for one man. Watch him as he leaps and
>>>> > stmops
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.youtube.com/v/m6rqXHX3O48
>>>>
>>>> I don't have SWF support set up yet. But I'm guessing it is Sweaty
>>>> Ballmer.
>>>
>>> Great Linux advocacy there. A guy named "Linonut", who one would
>>> expect from the name to be pretty good at setting up Linux, can't view
>>> videos on the most popular video site in the world...that sure makes
>>> Linux look good, doesn't it?
>>
>> Doesn't reflect on the capabilities of Linux whatsoever. It just means
>> Linonut hasn't bothered to install flash. I shoulkd have thought that
>> was obvious.
>
> Windows does not play Flash.
>
> Windows does not have an office suite.
>
> Windows is not able to handle PDF files.
>
> ...
Get lost you fool///////////////////////
Linux fails at far more website than Window ever has.....
Try Disney for example.
Turn a 16 year old loose with Linux and I can assure you that within the
hour you will be called to fix things.
Doesn't happen with Windows.
Sure does with Linux.
|
|
