Jim Hubbard wrote:
> The one thing that is blindingly obvious to me about the Microsoft threats
> of patent lawsuits has gone all but unnoticed in the main stream media.
>
> If is it true that Microsoft holds patents on the Linux OS that it can use
> to force compliance from Linux distos, then wouldn't that mean that
> Microsoft is truly a monopoly where operating systems are concerned?
Not at all. Patents have nothing to do with being a monopoly
And there is no question *if* MS is a monopoly or not. It *is* one
Only some widiots here in cola /question/ that very fact
> If it is truly a monopoly, we should again look into breaking up the
> company like the government wanted to do back in the 90's.
>
Strawman.
MS should simply be hauled before a judge for extortion
--
Another name for a Windows tutorial is crash course
|
|
